<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Marta Kołczyńska</title>
    <link>https://martakolczynska.com/</link>
    <description>Recent content on Marta Kołczyńska</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>&amp;copy; 2018. Marta Kołczyńska</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="https://martakolczynska.com/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Contact</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/contact/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/contact/</guid>
      <description>e-mail:
mkolczynska(at)isppan.waw.pl</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Does polarization increase protest? A note on Griffin et al. 2020 (BJPS, 51, 3)</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/polarization-protest-bjps/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Sep 2024 11:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/polarization-protest-bjps/</guid>
      <description>The 2020 paper “Deprivation in the Midst of Plenty: Citizen Polarization and Political Protest” by Griffin, Kiewiet de Jonge, and Velasco-Guachalla, published by in British Journal of Political Science, contains a data error that invalidates the study’s main results and conclusions that polarization leads to higher protest activity. The error is quite trivial and lies in the construction of the dependent variable of the study. After fixing the data error the results no longer indicate a positive effect of polarization on protest, nor a moderating effect of grievances.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Trends in educational attainment in Europe</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/eurostat-age-gender-education/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 22:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/eurostat-age-gender-education/</guid>
      <description>Note: This part of data processing was used to construct poststratification tables used to create country-year estimates of political trust in Europe. The full paper titled “Modeling public opinion over time and space: Trust in state institutions in Europe, 1989-2019” is availabe on SocArXiv: https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/3v5g7/. This research was supported by the Bekker Programme of the Polish National Agency for Academic Mobility under award number PPN/BEK/2019/1/00133.
The Eurostat provides a host of useful data, including socio-demographic statistics on educational attainment, which enable tracking the changes in educational composition of European societies over the last several years.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>(In)Consistency between international corruption indicators</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/corruption-indicators/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2020 21:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/corruption-indicators/</guid>
      <description>Overview Scatter plots Correlations Trends in corruption indicators in Europe, 1990-2019   Note: Results from this post are presented more systematically in the paper “Marketplace of indicators: Inconsistencies between country trends of measures of governance” co-authored with Paul Bürkner and available on SocArXiv: https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/u8gsc/.
Overview Measuring corruption is hard, especially if one is interested in having corruption indicators that are comparable across countries and over time. Arguably the most famous corruption ranking is the Corruption Perceptions Index published annually by Transparency International, but it can’t be used for over-time comparisons (cf.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Cleaning Freedom House indicators</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/cleaning-fh-data/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2019 22:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/cleaning-fh-data/</guid>
      <description>How to clean a very untidy data set with Freedom House country ratings, saved in an Excel sheet, which violates many principles of data organization in spreadsheets described in this paper by Karl Broman and Kara Woo, but otherwise is an invaluable source of data on freedom in the world?
Data source: https://freedomhouse.org/content/freedom-world-data-and-resources
The full code used in this post is available here.
I would do this:
Read in the file,</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Environmental attitudes in Europe</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/environment-evs5/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 12:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/environment-evs5/</guid>
      <description>The climate protests in March 2019 mobilized over a million of people around the globe. A team of social scientists from universities across Europe organized a survey of the #FridaysForFuture strike events on March 15 in 13 cities in nine countries. The report can be found here. A new wave of climate protests (and surveys) is planned for the end of September.
Naturally, most participants at these protests are acutely aware of the environmental threats and motivated to take action.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Toxicity of comments to votes in Request for Adminship on English Wikipedia</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/wikipedia-rfa-toxicity-perspective/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 23:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/wikipedia-rfa-toxicity-perspective/</guid>
      <description>This post was written during a research visit at the Department of Computer Science at Aalto University, Finland, supported by the Helsinki Institute for Information Technology.
Perspective is an API that uses machine learning models to predict the impact of a comment on the conversation. One of the models predicts the extent to which the comment might be perceived as toxic. A toxic comment is defined as “a rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable comment that is likely to make you leave a discussion.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Codebook from ISSP waves 1985-2017</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/issp-codebook/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2019 03:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/issp-codebook/</guid>
      <description>The International Social Survey Programme offers a wealth of data, with thematic modules repeated around every 10 years, and a solid and relatively stable block of socio-demographics. The data can be downloaded from the GESIS data archive either in separate files per year or with data bundled by topic (e.g., the Social Inequality dataset contains data from rounds 1987, 1992, 1999, and 2009).
There is no integrated codebook indicating the availability of variables in different rounds, so someone interested in longitudinal analyses would need to download all files, open them and look for the variables of interest.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Do-It-Yourself Harmonization: Exploring trust items in three European survey projects</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/harmonization-europe-trust/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2019 13:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/harmonization-europe-trust/</guid>
      <description>Introduction Illustration: Trust in institutions Step 1: Preparation and coding of technical variables Step 2: Selection of source variables for harmonization Step 3: Mapping source values to target values Step 4: Harmonization  Results: Availability of trust items Comparability of sample aggregates Appendices: Code examples Appendix 1: Data preparation Appendix 2: Codebook from labelled data in R Appendix 3: Values crosswalk Appendix 4: Harmonization    Introduction Ex-post (or retrospective) data harmonization refers to procedures applied to already collected data to improve the comparability and inferential equivalence of measures collected by different studies.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Searchable codebook from labelled data in R</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/codebook-labelled-data/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2019 03:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/codebook-labelled-data/</guid>
      <description>Working with categorical data, such as from surveys, requires a codebook. After spending some time unsuccessfully looking for a function that would create a nice, searchable codebook from labelled data in R, I decided to write my own. What I want to achieve is a simple table with variable names, labels, and frequencies of labelled values like the one below, to search for specific keywords in the value labels and to see distributions of various variables.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>So you want to harmonize data?</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/harmonization-versus-fugue/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 23:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/harmonization-versus-fugue/</guid>
      <description>So You Want to Write a Fugue?
Glenn Gould   So you want to write a fugue?
You’ve got the urge to write a fugue
You’ve got the nerve to write a fugue
So go ahead and write a fugue that we can sing
Pay no heed to what we’ve told you
Give no mind to what we’ve told you
Just forget all that we’ve told you
And the theory that you’ve read</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Political trust among electoral winners and losers in Europe</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/ess-trust-institutions-electoral-winners-losers/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 11:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/ess-trust-institutions-electoral-winners-losers/</guid>
      <description>Winner-loser trust gap across countries Winner-loser trust gap in Poland Trust differences across parties in Poland   Voting for a party that ends up losing the election is known to be associated with lower satisfaction with democracy and trust in the parliament (cf. Martini and Quaranta 2019). How does Poland compare to other European countries? How has the winner-loser trust gap changed in Poland over time, and how have trust levels among supporters of current and former ruling parties changed in periods when they were not in government?</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Downloading country-level indicators on participation and economic inequality 2</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/participation-inequality-indices-2/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2019 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/participation-inequality-indices-2/</guid>
      <description>Data Packages Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem): Dedicated package Polyarchy: Semicolon delimited CSV file -&amp;gt; rio Freedom House: Excel file with by-year sheets Polity IV: SPSS file -&amp;gt; rio Democracy Barometer: Excel file with header in top rows -&amp;gt; rio The Standardized World Income Inequality Database (SWIID): Plain CSV file -&amp;gt; rio World Bank’s World Development Indicators: Dedicated package Merging all datasets Writing to file   Shortly after writing this post on importing datasets in different formats (CSV, XLS, XLSX, SAV) to R, I got the following comment:</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Downloading country-level indicators on participation and economic inequality</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/participation-inequality-indices/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2019 13:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/participation-inequality-indices/</guid>
      <description>Data Packages Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem): Dedicated package Polyarchy: Semicolon delimited CSV file Freedom House: Excel file with by-year sheets Polity IV: SPSS file Democracy Barometer: Excel file with header in top rows The Standardized World Income Inequality Database (SWIID): Plain CSV file World Bank’s World Development Indicators: Dedicated package Merging all datasets Country graphs Variable graphs Writing to file   with Viktoriia Muliavka
Social and political scientists often need to put together datasets of country-level political, economic, and demographic variables with data from different sources.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Voter shifts in parliamentary elections in Poland, 2007-2015</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/polpan-voting-alluvial-plots/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 11:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/polpan-voting-alluvial-plots/</guid>
      <description>How 2015 voters voted in 2007 and 2011 How 2007 voters voted in 2011 and 2015 About POLPAN   Where did the current governing party get their votes from? Did supporters of the previous ruling party switch preferences or did they abstain from voting altogether? Cross-sectional datasets, such as one-off election polls, do not typically provide data to answer these questions. Panel studies, such as the Polish Panel Survey (POLPAN), do.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Measuring meritocracy with survey data</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/issp-meritocracy-edu-income/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 15:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/issp-meritocracy-edu-income/</guid>
      <description>Determining meritocratic allocation Calculating the distance to meritocracy Distance to meritocracy by country   Meritocracy is a principle according to which rewards are based on merit, as well as an ideal situation resulting from the operation of this principle. In their 1985 Social Foces paper titled “How Far to Meritocracy? Empirical Tests of a Controversial Thesis”, Tadeusz Krauze and Kazimierz M. Słomczyński proposed an algorithm to construct a theoretical joint distribution of education and income, given their marginal distributions, that would satisfy the conditions of meritocratic allocation.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>What comes first: Exploring public interest in tech-related topics</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/delabuw-hackathon-what-comes-first/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 16:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/delabuw-hackathon-what-comes-first/</guid>
      <description>What comes first? Wikipedia, Google, News Interest in technology Cross-correlations News coverage versus Wikipedia page views    with Maria Khachatryan, Filip Kowalski, Jakub Siwiec, and Paweł Zawadzki
The Hackathon Next Generation Internet Data Sprint was organized by the Digital Economy Lab of the University of Warsaw on November 9 and 10, 2018. The goal of the hackathon was to explore datasets on Wikipedia page views and edits, Reddit posts, media mentions, and others, to generate insights about the use of the internet and new technologies.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Biking in Barcelona: Green City Hackathon</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/bigsurv18-hackathon/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 10:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/bigsurv18-hackathon/</guid>
      <description>BigSurv18 and the Green City Hackathon Team number 5 Data Bike use Altitude of Bicing stations Location of mechanical and electric bike stations Empty stations by station altitude Next steps   with Saleha Habibullah, Sakinat Folorunso, and Vera Paul
BigSurv18 and the Green City Hackathon One of accompanying events of the BigSurv18: Big Data Meets Survey Science conference in Barcelona last week was the Green City Hackathon.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Political participation patterns in Poland</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/ess-lca-participation/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/ess-lca-participation/</guid>
      <description>Political participation in Poland Latent class analysis Three types of participants: the Disengaged, Activists, and Protesters Region maps   I recently came across Jennifer Oser’s 2017 article in Social Indicators Research about “political tool kits”, i.e. profiles (or patterns) of participation in different political activities. Her general argument is that research on citizen participation would benefit from analyses of such participation patterns instead of (or at least in addition to) just looking at determinants of participation in single activities.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Personal vs. household income in cross-national surveys</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/sdr-income-hh-personal-cor/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2018 10:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/sdr-income-hh-personal-cor/</guid>
      <description>Sample correlations Sample correlations by gender Sample correlations by age Sample correlations by education Contrast Conclusion   One of the reasons for the harmonization of personal income in addition to household income was to check if the two correlate highly enough to use household income as a substitute for personal income in analyses where economic status is a control variable. This would be great, because household income variables are available in 1177 surveys out of 1721 analyzed in the Survey Data Recycling dataset (SDR) version 1, while personal income only in 453 surveys.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Harmonizing measures of income in cross-national surveys</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/sdr-income-hh-personal/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 17:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/sdr-income-hh-personal/</guid>
      <description>Data Number of response options Item non-response Distributions Harmonized target variables Next steps   with Przemek Powałko
Individual economic status is a necessary element of almost all sociological analyses, including studies of political attitudes and behavior. To supplement the already harmonized variables in the Survey Data Recycling dataset (SDR) version 1 and for the purposes of my resesarch of the effects of education on political engagement, Przemek and I harmonized two additional variables: personal income and household income1.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Measuring the level and inequality of political participation with survey data</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/participation-inequality-ess/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 03:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/participation-inequality-ess/</guid>
      <description>Political participation in the ESS Country levels of political participation Inequality of political participation Democracy indicators Economic inequality Matrix scatter plots   How to measure political inequality? The Variaties of Democracy project (V-Dem) has a set of political equality indicators that capture the extent to which political power is distributed according to wealth and income, membership in a particular social group, gender or sexual orientation (cf. V-Dem Codebook v.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Age distributions in samples from cross-national survey projects</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/sdr-age-distributions/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2018 10:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/sdr-age-distributions/</guid>
      <description>Cross-national survey projects conduct surveys on representative samples of adult populations. How do the distributions of respondents’ age vary across surveys carried out in the same country in different years and different projects?
Like in a couple of previous posts (here, here and here) I use data from the Survey Data Recycling dataset (SDR) version 1, which includes selected harmonized variables from 22 cross-national survey projects. SDR only includes surveys that claim to have samples representative for adult populations.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Reliability of survey estimates: Participation in demonstrations</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/sdr-demonstrations-multiplets/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2018 17:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/sdr-demonstrations-multiplets/</guid>
      <description>Data Differences within country-years Differences by groups Gender Age Urban/rural residence Education Sampling scheme    The growth in cross-national survey projects in the last decades leads to situations when two or more surveys are carried out in the same country and the same year but in different projects, and contain overlapping sets of survey questions. Assuming that the surveys are based on representative samples - a claim that major cross-national survey projects typically make - it could be expected that estimates from surveys carried out in the same country and year are reasonably close.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>tidytext analysis of TED talks</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/ted-talks/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2018 09:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/ted-talks/</guid>
      <description>Setup tidy TED talks Applause, LOL Sentiment   This year I spent two weeks of the summer attending the Summer Institute for Computational Social Science Parter Site (SICSS) in Tvärminne and Helsinki, Finland, organized by Matti Nelimarkka from Aalto University and the University of Helsinki, assisted by two TAs: Juho Pääkkönen and Pihla Toivanen from the University of Helsinki. I highly recommend it to anyone with background in the social sciences and interested in computer and data sciences, or the other way around!</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Validating survey data: Educational attainment in SDR and the OECD</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/education-sdr-oecd/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2018 05:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/education-sdr-oecd/</guid>
      <description>Educational attainment data OECD data SDR data Cleaning and merging SDR and OECD data  Results The curious case of ISSP Switzerland Conclusion Appendix   with Przemek Powałko
General population surveys with representative samples should have a similar education structure as shown by data from administrative sources, especially if survey weights are used. In this post we compare sample aggregates from 15 cross-national survey projects (including the European Social Survey, the World Values Survey and the European Values Study, and others) from the Survey Data Recycling database with educational attainment statistics from the OECD.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Dot plot challenge: Voting gender gaps in Europe</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/dot-plot-voting-ess/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 12:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/dot-plot-voting-ess/</guid>
      <description>Getting and reshaping the data The Dot Plot   The August edition of the Storytelling with Data challenge #SWDchallenge stars the dot plot. Here is a simple plot of the gender gap in voting in national elections using the most recent 8th Round of the European Social Survey, ESS.
Getting and reshaping the data library(essurvey) # getting European Social Survey data library(tidyverse) # data cleaning and reshaping library(countrycode) # converting country codes to names library(ggplot2) # plots With the essurvey package the ESS data can be downloaded directly to R.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Shiny app for exploring harmonized cross-national survey data (SDR v.1.0)</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/sdr-exploration-shiny/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2018 07:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/sdr-exploration-shiny/</guid>
      <description>Instructions References    In the previous post I wrote about downloading and exploring the Survey Data Recycling (SDR), version 1 dataset, which consists of selected harmonized variables from 22 survey projects, 1966-2013.
The SDR project will develop a website for browsing, subsetting, downloading, and visualizing data from the SDR project. This website is currently under construction. Meanwhile, I made a Shiny app with basic functionalities of the future on-line browsing and subsetting tool (also serves as its mock-up): https://mkolczynska.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Exploring the dataset of survey datasets: Survey Data Recycling version 1</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/sdr-exploration/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/sdr-exploration/</guid>
      <description>Introduction Downloading the SDR data Exploring SDR: availability of variables by project Exploring SDR: availability of variables with different formulations Identifying surveys containing selected variables Subsetting the Master File Country coverage plot   Combining data from different survey projects creates new opportunities for research, alas, at the cost of increased volume (obviously) and complexity of the data. The Survey Data Recycling project created a dataset with data from 22 international survey projects.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>ISA World Congress 2018: Analysis of tweets</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/isa-twitter/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/isa-twitter/</guid>
      <description>Getting data from Twitter Tweets over time Text analysis Tweets by ISA Resesarch Committee   The International Sociological Association 19th World Congress of Sociology in Toronto (15-21 July) has received quite some Twitter coverage. Waiting to board the flight back to Warsaw, I wanted to take a look at these Twitter data and apply the newly acquired skills in text analysis (thanks to the Summer Institute for Computational Social Science, SICSS, Partner Site in Tvärminne and Helsinki, Finland).</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Late start</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/post/first-post/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 13:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/post/first-post/</guid>
      <description>How it all started Step 1. R Step 2. On-line resources Step 3. Done is better than perfect References   This blog is going to be mostly about my adventures with R, primarily using survey data, and usually somewhat related to my social science interests; for the fun of it, to share code and hopefully get feedback.
How it all started General law of academia: The capacity for generating ideas is greater than the capacity of developing ideas into papers.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>About</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/about/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/about/</guid>
      <description>I am an assistant professor at the Institute of Political Studies of the Polish Academy of Sciences and PI of a project on the polarization of political trust (funded by Poland&amp;rsquo;s National Science Centre, 2019/32/C/HS6/00421, project website) and on political polarization and participation (2022/04/Y/HS6/00024, project website).
In the recent years I was a visiting researcher at the Research and Expertise Centre for Survey Methodology at Universitat Pompeu Fabra in Barcelona (2021-2022), the Probabilistic Machine Learning Group, Department of Computer Science, Aalto University (2020-2021) and at the Chair for Central and Eastern European Studies, Technical University of Chemnitz (2019-2020).</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Research</title>
      <link>https://martakolczynska.com/research/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://martakolczynska.com/research/</guid>
      <description>My current research deals with the causes and consequences of political trust and political polarization. The issues I explore include the effects of economic, institutional, and democratic performance on political trust, their relative importance and differences across countries. Another part of this research focuses on the association between polarization and trust, and their consequences for political participation and engagement. The grant is funded by the Polish National Science Centre (2019/32/C/HS6/00421 and 2022/04/Y/HS6/00024).</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>